Skip to main content (Press Enter).
Skip auxiliary navigation (Press Enter).
Organizational Behavior Division
Skip main navigation (Press Enter).
Executive Committee Meeting Minutes
Five Year Report
OB Division Bylaws
About the OB Division
Lyman Porter Award
Making Connections Award
Media - Podcast
Media - Video Interviews
Post a Message
Share a File
Making Connections Committee
Social Media Committee
Technology and Media Team
Thanks to our volunteers
Want to get involved?
OB Student’s Guide to AOM
Countdown to AOM
OB Doctoral Consortium at Academy of Management
Job Market Tips
Student Rep Team
2017-18 Topic: Inequity
2018-19 Topic Ethics
2019-20 Topic Inclusion
Discussion: View Thread
Call for Papers: JMP Special Issue on Women Leaders
Call for Papers: JMP Special Issue on Women Leaders
Posted 21 days ago
Reply to Discussion
Reply to Sender
See attached or read below for details:
Special issue call for papers from Journal of Managerial Psychology
Paper submission deadline:
March 31, 2019
Donna Chrobot-Mason, University of Cincinnati
Katina Sawyer, George Washington University
Rosemary Hays-Thomas, University of West Florida
Growing evidence shows that women, more than ever before, are preparing themselves to be leaders. For example, women are
more likely to graduate college than men (https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d16/tables/dt16_303.70.asp). Further, in the U.S.,
female entrepreneurship is increasing at a faster rate than male entrepreneurship
Additionally, in a recent meta-analysis of perceptions of female leaders, it was shown that women are now viewed as equally
capable leaders compared to their male counterparts (Paustian-Underdahl, Walker, & Woehr, 2014). And yet, the data clearly show
that women remain underrepresented in leadership roles and that the percentage of women running Fortune 500 companies has
essentially remained unchanged during the past 15 years (Catalyst, 2018). Indeed, a report conducted by the United Nations found
that in the majority of the 67 countries involved in the study from 2009 to 2015, fewer than a third of senior-and middle management
positions were held by women (https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg5,
A goal of the United Nations is to achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls (https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/gender-equality/). The UN states "providing women and girls with equal access to education, health care, decent work, and representation in political and economic decision-making processes will fuel sustainable economies and benefit societies and humanity at large."
Achieving this goal however, is all the more challenging given the research that has been conducted to date on women and
leadership. Our scholarly understanding of leadership is still largely based on male samples and masculine views of successful
leadership. In this Special Issue on Women Leaders, we seek innovative quantitative and qualitative empirical research, as well as
conceptual papers that will advance our understanding of leadership of, about, and for women leaders. Below is a list of possible
topics and research questions that are representative of the aims and scope of this Special Issue.
Leadership development for women.
Leadership has been defined as a socially constructed process of claiming and being granted
a leadership identity (DeRue &Ashford, 2010). Thus, leadership development and ultimately leadership success must begin with the
claiming of a leader identity. Zheng and Muir (2015) suggest women may resist self-identification as leaders because it is
incongruent with current views of self. Additional research is needed to examine the leadership development process for women
and how organizations can facilitate their development.
Advantages and benefits of female leaders.
Work by Eagly and colleagues (Eagly, Makhijani, & Klonsky, 1992; Eagly & Carli, 2003)
suggests that women leaders and more feminine styles of leadership may be an advantage in today's contemporary workplace. Yet
the boundary conditions for these advantages remain unclear. A recent meta-analysis examining the business case for women
leaders suggests that the results are complex and historical research methods need re-examination (Hoobler, Masterson, & Nkomo,
2018). They argue the need for greater specification of underlying mechanisms linking leadership to performance.
Affirming workplaces for women
. Many women report leaving the workplace as a result of what they perceive to be inhospitable
work environments. Although decades of research on work-family balance have contributed to our understanding of what
organizations can do to facilitate working parents, additional research is needed to understand other contextual factors that foster
retention of women leaders.
Strategies for overcoming barriers.
As a field, we know a great deal more about the obstacles and barriers that prevent women
from advancing in organizations to assume leadership roles such as discrimination and stereotypes. Greater attention should be
paid to how women are overcoming such barriers to achieve success and how male allies can help.
Intersectionality and women's leadership.
Even within the women's leadership literature, a majority of our understanding of female
leaders is rooted in experiences of white, assumedly straight women. In order to truly understand the experiences and perceptions
of female leaders, a greater diversity of women must be represented in our samples. Privileging intersectionality in studies of
women's leadership is key to a comprehensive understanding of women's leadership overall.
Career trajectories of successful women leaders.
Many organizations promote individuals to top leadership positions based in part
on their educational background or prior successful experience in certain roles or settings. Additional research is needed to
understand the extent to which women and men follow similar career paths on their way to prominent leadership positions and
how such paths and expectations are explicitly or implicitly communicated to men and women aspiring to higher leadership roles.
Submission Process and Timeline
To be considered for the Special Issue, manuscripts must be submitted no later than March 31, 2019, 5:00 pm Eastern Standard
Time. Submitted papers will undergo a double-blind peer review process and will be evaluated by at least two reviewers and a
special issue editor. Acceptance decisions will be based on the review team's judgments of the paper's contribution on four key dimensions:
(1) Theoretical contribution: Does the article meaningfully extend existing research and theory on women in leadership?
(2) Empirical contribution: Does the article offer innovative findings using an appropriate study design and data analysis?
(3) Practical contribution: Does the article present practical implications for improving organizational workplaces for women and
the development of female leaders?
(4) Relevance to the special issue topic.
Authors should prepare their manuscripts for blind review according to the Journal of Managerial Psychology author guidelines,
Remove any information that could potentially reveal the identity of the authors to
reviewers. Manuscripts should be submitted electronically at:
For questions regarding the
special issue, please contact Donna Chrobot-Mason at
Catalyst, Pyramid: Women in S&P 500 Companies (June 1, 2018).
DeRue, D. S., & Ashford, S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in
organizations. Academy of Management Review, 35(4), 627-647.
Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G., & Klonsky, B. G. (1992). Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin,
Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L.L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(6),
Hoobler, J. M., Masterson, C. R., & Nkomo, S. M. (2018). The business case for women leaders: Meta-analysis, research critique,
and path forward. Journal of Management, 44 (6), 2473 –2499. DOI: 10.1177/0149206316628643
Paustian-Underdahl, S. C., Walker, L. S., & Woehr, D. J. (2014). Gender and perceptions of leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis
of contextual moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1129-1145.
Zheng, W., & Muir, D. (2015). Embracing leadership: A multi-faceted model of leader identity development. Leadership &
Organization Development Journal, 36(6), 630-656.
The George Washington University
Call for papers - Special Issue on Women Leaders - Journa...pdf
New Best Answer
This thread already has a best answer. Would you like to mark this message as the new best answer?
Copyright Academy of Management. All rights reserved.
Powered by Higher Logic
Tags for Organizational Behavior (OB) community.
Add a tag
Divisions and Interest Groups
Managerial and Organizational Cognition
Organization and Management Theory
Organization Development and Change
Organizational Communication and Information Systems
Technology and Innovation Management
Connect @ AOM
Call for Paper
User Tags may not contain the following characters: @ # $ & :