Hi Aaron,
Great the B&M university has worked out for you as desired.
Having gone through this process myself, I feel we all have different
goals for the choices we make and the results we yield. I really
cannot see how an individual seeking a doctoral education would simply
throw themselves in a program of study at this level without, first,
researching it thoroughly and making sure of the fit factor. Those who
simply throw themselves into graduate education without ample research
and consultations may want to consider other career paths.
I am baffled by those enlightened academics (researchers) making
blanket statements about non-traditional and traditional education and
throwing value judgments left, right, and center. My experience is
that each of these has its own merits strictly based on individual
needs and aspirations, including career goals and/or personal
gratification. Mid-career professionals seeking doctoral education
may consider B&M universities to be way too traditional for their
liking and personal and professional experiences. As a matter of fact
the majority of doctoral programs at North American institutions cater
to the more classical full-time resident student, which is perfectly
fine for that particular type.
Those of us already at the peak of our professional life and are not
looking at doctoral education to simply get a university post --
either because we are already there or are not interested in becoming
junior professors-- have a very limited pool of non-traditional
programs to select from. as a result, non-traditional education seems
to be the natural and more logical choice for many professionals at
that level of engagement.
Having heard some of the negative comments on this topic, I would
really caution folks lumping all non-traditional doctoral programs
under "online programs" because some are simply "different" and do not
technically qualify as online distance programs. Take for example
Fielding Graduate University which follows a distributed learning
model that develops scholar-practitioners. The FGU model is based on
cohorts of students meeting at regional and national sessions to meet
with faculty and work, learn and grow together. Two national sessions
are offered every year with intensives, seminars and workshops where
faculty and students work together and where some engage in
dissertation committee meetings. Many Research and Practice (RaP)
sessions are organized by students and faculty throughout the year and
in a multiple locations throughout the US and Canada, and to a lesser
degree in different international sites. Students normally form their
own small teams based on a number of different criteria that include
personal relationships, subject matter, location, etc. Many more
elect to work alone and develop their skills through different means
and venues, including being involved with other PhD students and
faculty at local traditional universities.
Now, is the distributed learning model good for everyone? the answer
is a resounding 'NO.' I have seen fellow students enter and drop out
at different stages of the program, and for a slew of different
reasons. By the same token there are also those who excel in this
format and go on to graduate and become leaders in their area of
specialty. I personally know and have heard of many who have gone to
becoming excellent academics at traditional universities.
Fielding Graduate University has recently gone through a full WASC
accreditation process which it passed with flying colors. The WASC
accrediting team went through every single detail one can think of to
determine whether FGU meets the standards for accreditation. FGU was
found to have even exceeded these in many ways than one, particularly
in the area of diversity and social justice. I happen to know about
these details because I participated in WASC related activities as a
student member of the governance team.
In my humble opinion boxing doctoral education one way or another is
nothing short of an exercise in futility. We know from theory and
practice that when change is the norm experimenting with new
strategies, methods and tools is key for a given society
(research-intensive societies in particular) to become more robust and
resilient.
How many people on this list are hereby practicing what they preach in
the classroom about innovation and creativity? Can someone provide me
with any reliable metrics that show graduates of traditional programs
to have higher degrees of success than their non-traditional
counterparts, in not only becoming university professors but also
excelling at it (e.g. job performance and student evaluation data)?
I thought doctoral education was to a larger degree based on
individuality and personal abilities, and that graduate universities
pride themselves on attracting self-directed doctoral students with
the ability and drive to find solutions and seek higher knowledge
through learning by trial and error, and by depending less on profs
and mentors. How many of you know or have even bitched about
incompetent colleagues (some have graduated from prestigious
universities) you believe in your heart of hearts that they should not
be teaching and researching at all? I happen to know quite a few!
So let's cut the crap and be a bit more humble and realistic in our
assessment of the different types of learning models out there and
their effectiveness in turning high-caliber PhD graduates.
Cheers,
Ali.
Ali Cheaib.
Professor of Computer Science
Mohawk College
Room E132 - Fennell Campus
350 Fennell Street West
Hamilton, Ontario
Canada L8W 3H1
905-575-1212 x.3226
ali.cheaib@mohawkcollege.ca
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:42 AM, Aaron Moses <
aaron@mosesfamily.ws> wrote:
> Richard,
> I am a Ph.D Student who considered online programs before I started my Ph.D.
> I am certainly glad that I chose the "brick and mortar" route. First let
> me respond to the previous post. In a Ph.D Seminar we are not discussing in
> the classroom for "1 hour" but for three hours, which we spent many hours
> preparing for. Beyond that, most Ph.D students here office together so the
> discussions continue beyond the classroom and extend out for days. Mentoring
> each other, encouraging each other and support in general is critical and we
> have that in this setting. Beyond that, we have established relationships
> with professors that we meet with at least weekly for an hour at a time in
> which we discuss our progress, work on projects, write papers together, and
> are mentored into quality academics in general. Many of us have
> publications in quality journals and Academy of Management conference papers
> that are entirely a result of this process.
> I personally know people that went through online Ph.D programs and they
> are not having the same success and certainly do not have the same
> consideration for academic positions that I have seen the "brick and mortar"
> students have. I am very thankful that I chose to come to one of these
> institutions; it is difficult, rigorous, takes a lot of time, but I am
> confident in my abilities and my future.
>
>
> Aaron Moses
> Ph.D Student, GTA
> Department of Management
> College of Business Administration, Rm 604
> University of Texas at Arlington
>
>
>
>
> On Jul 18, 2010, at 2:43 PM, Diane Ballard wrote:
>
> Richard- I just finished my PhD program with Capella. I had an awesome
> experience... and my ideas and skills were always being tested by faculty as
> well as fellow students. The online classroom can be very engaging and
> discussions can continue several days versus one hour in the physical
> classroom.
>
> What I appreciated most about the online classroom is that we were REQUIRED
> to participate in discussion (unlike attending a traditional classroom with
> students who never peep a sound the whole semester). We were not measured
> by the number of times we logged on to the system for the week (as I have
> seen with some traditional university undergraduate online classes). Our
> thoughtful comments had to consist of 200+ words or more, and referenced APA
> style. Our comments weren't opinions. Our discussions were supported by
> scholarly research. We were required to reply to other student's discussion
> questions with 200+ words or more, referenced APA style. How is this NOT
> engaging? Moreover, how is this not SCHOLARLY? The bottom line is I was
> pushed to think and write like a scholar throughout my learning journey at
> Capella.
>
> I appreciated Capella's stance on helping the student succeed by offering a
> wealth of resources- resources that were
> available to me 24/7!
>
> Totally disagree with Nancy's assumption that smart and capable faculty are
> only found in brick and mortar institutions. Where's the research to
> support that comment?
>
> Diane K Ballard, PhD
>
>
Original Message -----
> From: Day, Nancy
> To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
> Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2010 10:37 AM
> Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] PhD program online
> I have to agree with David’s point below. If you want a PhD for a
> tenure-track, research-based career, an online PhD a bad idea. I have a
> friend who’d always wanted a PhD, didn’t really want to get out of her
> corporate HR leadership role, but just wanted the piece of paper. It’s fine
> for her; it gave her what she wanted. However, it won’t help her career one
> iota, and it won’t help her get a good academic job.
>
> She also asked me to participate in her dissertation, and I couldn’t agree
> more with David on this. Her research skills were nonexistent, and I’ve seen
> sharp undergraduate students do the same level or better work in a class
> project. So perhaps an online program can give you the basic knowledge of
> the topic (e.g. organizational behavior), but it won’t help you develop
> research skills, which are critical to a traditional academic degree.
>
> It’s also much more engaging and rewarding to be involved with other
> students and smart, capable faculty than being online – that’s how your
> ideas and skills get tested and developed. If at all possible, my
> recommendation to anyone considering an online PhD would be to try to
> re-engineer things in your life to go for a more traditional approach to
> your education. It’s a much better use of your time and money.
>
> Good luck!
>
> From: Organizational Behavior Division Listserv
> [mailto:OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU] On Behalf Of David McLain
> Sent: Friday, July 16, 2010 2:38 PM
> To: OB@AOMLISTS.PACE.EDU
> Subject: Re: [OB-LIST] PhD program online
>
> I sit on our university's IRB and recently reviewed a research proposal from
> a faculty member who has not yet completed her PhD. She is completing her
> PhD online through the U of Phoenix. The study will be part of her
> Sociology PhD degree program.
>
> I don't know what the theoretical foundations of her study were (I could not
> find any), but the only measure being used was a series of questions taken
> from a radio program heard on Natl Public Radio. She seemed not to be
> getting good advice from her U of Phoenix faculty else the study would have
> been better designed.
>
> Don't take on online degree unless you get a rigorous education in the
> conduct of research. That includes the kind of personal evaluation and
> feedback necessary to design a good dissertation project.
>
> Just an N=1 observation from me.
>
> David McLain
>
> SUNY
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Richard Cruz <richard.cruz@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> As online programs gain more and more traction and become an option to
> pursue an advanced degree, are there some programs that have started to
> stand out above the rest? I am seriously considering working on a PhD, but
> will likely have to take the online route to make this goal a reality. Any
> suggestions in the OB field?
>
> Thank you,
> Richard Cruz
>
>