Entrepreneurship (ENT)

 View Only

ENT Microsite

#ExperimentsENT
#ENT
#AOM2020
#STR
#Strategic_Management
#Gender and Diversity in Organizations
#Entrepreneurship
#EntTeaching
#EntTeaching
#Gender and Diversity in Organizations
#STR
#Technology and Innovation Management
#Technology and Innovation Management
#Social Issues in Management
#Research Methods
#EntTeaching
#Entrepreneurship
#Organizational Behavior
#Managerial and Organizational Cognition
#Organization and Management Theory
#darkside
#Misconduct
#ENT
#Strategic_Management
#EntTeaching
#Careers
#Entrepreneurship
#Annual Meeting
#AOM2023
#aomboston2023
#Managerial and Organizational Cognition
#Organization and Management Theory
#AOM2024
#crowdfunding
#crowdfunding
#Human Resources
#Strategic Management
#Organizational Behavior
#TIM
#STR
#International Management
#Organization and Management Theory
#Entrepreneurship
#Management Consulting
#OrganizationandManagementTheory
#AOM2025
#SocialIssuesinManagement
#ManagementConsulting
#ENT
#InternationalManagement
#TechnologyandInnovationManagement
#AnnualMeeting
#AOM2026
#academicpublishing
#academicresearch
#startup
#OnlineTeaching

Latest Discussions

Community Quick Links

Announcements

  • Message from Program Chair

    (posted on behalf of @Trenton Williams, Program Chair) 

    Dear Entrepreneurship Division Members,

    As we prepare for this year’s Academy of Management conference, I want to extend my sincere thanks to all of you who stepped forward to serve as reviewers for our program. With more than 1,400 submissions this year, the success of our program quite literally depends on your willingness to engage in this process. Your time, care, and thoughtful feedback are what make it possible for us to maintain the quality and rigor of our division.

    As I stated in my call for reviewers, you do a great service to our community when you jump in and provide constructive feedback to others—even if an assigned paper does not fit just right (or seemingly not at all!) with your expertise. As the program chair, I see the human side of this, and so I thank you for doing the best you can. Sometimes you are providing feedback to a first time submitter. Other times to someone jumping back into research who is nervous yet eager to reengage. And also there are very experienced faculty members seeking critical input on their work. Regardless, we all are in need of feedback for our work—so thank you for providing that!

    Reviewing, I know, is not always on the top of one’s list of joyful activities each year. However, if each of us is able to review even 1-3 papers each year then we would dramatically increase the quality, quantity, and value of feedback we all receive. Indeed, the cumulative effect of each person chipping in to review is what makes our division's program one of the strongest at AOM.

    A few quick things as we head into the conference:

    Sign up to review for next year— please! The easiest way to make sure we can keep making AOM a positive experience for submitters and participants is to set a reminder for yourself to review for AOM next year! I encourage you to sign up and make reviewing part of your annual community-engagement calendar (aom.org/events/reviewer-sign-up

    The program is continuing to take shape. AOM is working hard to finalize session and doing their best to navigate the multiple commitments many of you have. We encourage you to review the AOM Annual Meeting page for general updates. Division-specific updates will come through the Entrepreneurship Division channels.

    In-person submission constraints, and other outlets/options. Poster presentations and online program submissions both saw a meaningful uptick this year, and AOM is clearly leaning into virtual participation as a way to grow beyond the physical limits of the in-person event. This is great because as we grow, we face limitations in physical space needed to host sessions. 

    Why does this matter for you? Unfortunately, we were only able to accept about 50% of submissions this year due to space constraints in the physical venue. However, for online presentations and to some degree the poster sessions, these constraints are not as severe. As you plan future submissions, we encourage you to consider these pathways for getting your work into AOM. In particular, posters and online sessions might be a great option for those new to AOM hoping to increase their chances of getting their work accepted. 

    Again, thank you for engaging with us as a division! We’re honored that you’re a member of the division and we value each of you and your unique contributions. I hope that if you spot me at the conference that you will please come say “hello.” Please do know that you’re an essential member of our community and we hope you’ll continue to engage with us for many years to come.

    #AOM2026

  • 2026 Division Scholarly Program: Call for Submissions

    (posted on behalf of @Trenton Williams, Program Chair)

    The Entrepreneurship Division now invites paper, poster, and symposia proposal submissions for the 2026 Academy of Management Annual Meeting, 31 July-4 August 2026, in Philadelphia, PA, USA. As you consider your work and its fit with the various formats offered by AOM, I encourage you to please first review the submission guidelines provided here by AOM. Please also carefully review the submission processes and policies & ethics to ensure your work meets the guidelines to be considered. 
     
    ENT Division Submissions
    Please ensure your submissions to the Entrepreneurship Division align with its scope, which includes entrepreneurial ecosystems, self-employment, new venture creation, financing, small business management, family business, innovation, inclusiveness, firm growth, and sustainability. Broader concepts related to identifying, analyzing, and exploiting entrepreneurial opportunities are also welcome. Additionally, proposals may explore novelty, creativity, and innovation in individuals, organizations, and environments, as well as decision-making under uncertainty in various entrepreneurial contexts.
     
    As members of the Entrepreneurship Division, we are uniquely positioned to produce rigorous, practical research that highlights the importance of entrepreneurship at macro, meso, and micro levels of impact. Our work can help entrepreneurs, managers, policymakers, and stakeholders collaboratively address critical societal global challenges more effectively. We seek contributions from Entrepreneurship Division members touching on important topics for the diverse range of stakeholders we serve. This includes theoretical and empirical contributions, as well as pedagogical innovations and practices that serve our students and communities. 
     
    Conference and Other Awards
    Each year the Entrepreneurship Division awards high quality work as part of the program. These awards include “Best Empirical Paper,” Best Conceptual Paper,” “Best Family Business Paper,” and “Best Social Entrepreneurship Paper.” We also celebrate our reviewers with “Best Reviewer” awards. In addition to these conference awards, we celebrate innovations in Entrepreneurship Pedagogy and Entrepreneurship Practice as we acknowledge the diverse contributions made to our field. A full list of Conference and Other awards celebrated by the Entrepreneurship Division can be found here. We would love to see your submissions! 
     
    Submission Center Opening and Deadlines
    The submission center for the 2026 Annual Meeting will open early December 2025. The submission Deadline is 13 January 2026. Early submissions are highly encouraged.
     
    REVIEWERS NEEDED—YES, THAT MEANS YOU! 
    We strongly encourage all members—especially those who are submitting to the Entrepreneurship Division— to support our colleagues by reviewing for the Entrepreneurship Division. As our membership grows (almost 4,000 members), so too does the number of submissions and therefore the need for reviews. We are in need of over 1,500 reviewers to ensure a fair process for determining accepted submissions and for selecting Conference Paper awards. The reviewer sign-up system opens early December 2025.
    • Reviewing benefits others and the field. We all need feedback on our work. By reviewing for AOM you can grant an incredible gift to someone else by engaging with and constructively reviewing their work. Reviewing is a small, simple way that you can have an enormous impact on someone else’s life!  
    • Reviewing benefits you. Reviewing gives you visibility to AOM and our field’s ‘bleeding edge’ research topics; helps you develop an essential skill for our field; exposes you to topics outside of your immediate domain; and gives you a CV line item that can help stimulate future opportunities.  
    • Who is eligible to review? You can review as a first-time attendee, doctoral student, early-mid-late-etc. career academic, and practitioner. Has it been a while since you attended AOM? No worries—reviewing is a great way to re-engage! As long as you are interested in entrepreneurship research, we need your expertise and insights.
    • Want to help even more? Sign up as an ‘emergency reviewer.’ At times we need someone to come in on a moment’s notice and help us fulfill a review in an ‘emergency capacity.’ If you’re willing to do this because you (a) are a phenomenal human being and/or (b) would not mind the global (intergalactic even?) notoriety and status that comes with it (obviously!), we would greatly appreciate it, as will those who receive your feedback. You can indicate this preference in the AOM Reviewer system.    
     
    Thank You—Hope to See You in Philly! 
    Last year was historic as we held our annual meeting outside of North America in beautiful Copenhagen. It was invigorating engaging with you—many of whom were first-time attendees at AOM. We are excited to build on that energy during our 2026 annual meeting held in Philadelphia, PA, which is known as the “Birthplace of America.” It is our hope that you will join us to take advantage of the many different activities, events, and program features offered by the Entrepreneurship Division. 
     
    If you have any questions regarding program submissions to the Entrepreneurship Division, please direct those to Trent Williams (trentonwilliams@byu.edu).
  • Call for Professional Development Workshops

    (posted on behalf of @Keith Hmieleski, PDW Chair)

    Professional Development Workshops (PDWs) are among the most rewarding, stimulating, and enjoyable sessions of the Academy of Management (AOM) Annual Meeting. The Entrepreneurship Division invites creative and innovative proposals for interactive PDW sessions for the 2026 AOM Conference in Philadelphia, PA. We are inviting novel and engaging PDWs that explore Research (topics and methods), Teaching, and the interplay between Practice and Scholarship. Given its mission, “We Grow Entrepreneurial Scholars,” the ENT Division favors PDW proposals that give participants across career stages the opportunity to learn new skills, share ideas, help other scholars, have new experiences, and build connections. 
     
    How do PDWs contribute to the overall program? 
    PDWs are intended to complement, not replace, the regular AOM program. They should avoid conventional themes and topics and should not be structured as traditional paper or panel sessions. Instead, PDWs should be innovative in both content and format, exploring issues and fostering interactions that are not typically featured in the main program.
     
    PDW sessions are typically structured as workshops, breakout sessions, tutorials, discussion panels, research incubators, or other interactive formats. PDWs should be intellectually stimulating while also providing a safe environment to present and refine new ideas, connect diverse perspectives, and generate new research opportunities. By encouraging the exchange of ideas and collaboration across fields and disciplines, PDWs help advance innovative directions for research. We welcome submissions that feature original topics, creative approaches to interaction, and experimental session designs. Examples include the use of technology in novel ways, fostering participant engagement before or after the session, and encouraging new forms of collaboration during the session.
     
    Bridging Perspectives within the ENT Division and Across Divisions
    Proposals should appeal to members of the Entrepreneurship Division or align with its domain. This domain encompasses not only the study of self-employment, small-business management, family business, new-venture formation, innovation, and firm growth, but also broader issues such as the recognition, analysis, and exploitation of entrepreneurial opportunities; the nature of novelty, creativity, and innovation; and the ways in which individuals and groups exercise judgment under uncertainty. Sessions consisting primarily of standard paper presentations are more appropriate for traditional symposia.
     
    PDWs are designed to build bridges across diverse scholarly communities—both within the Entrepreneurship Division and across the Academy of Management. The most effective PDWs foster meaningful interaction among individuals and groups who do not typically engage in the same sessions, workshops, or activities. Bridging diverse perspectives may include, but is not limited to, connecting junior and senior scholars; academics and practitioners; scholars from different countries; academics pursuing varied career paths; and perspectives that span divisional or theoretical boundaries across the Academy.
     
    We encourage you to collaborate with colleagues both within and beyond the Division to submit PDW proposals with broad appeal to the wider Academy membership. PDWs offer a unique space for previously disconnected communities to come together, exchange knowledge and expertise, build new relationships, and ultimately contribute to the growth and advancement of the entrepreneurship field.
     
    Submission Format and Components
    Please attend carefully to the submission guidelines detailed below. Please note that the submission will not be reviewed if any of the guidelines and formatting requirements are not met. 
     
    Proposal Format Guidelines
    • PDW proposals can be submitted to only ONE sponsor (that is, one [1] Division, Division Interest Group [DIG], or affiliate).
    • Proposals should use the following page format: 
      • Times New Roman 12-point font.
      • Double-spaced.
      • 1-inch (2.5cm) margin all around.
      • 8.5" x 11”-page setting.
      • All submissions must be at least 4 pages but are limited to no more than 8 pages. You may use an appendix as needed to provide information that expands on the proposal.
      • The entire submission must be contained in ONE document and must be either .pdf, .doc, .docx, or .rtf format.
     
    Proposal Structure
    Your proposal should be organized as follows:
     
    Page 1: Title page which contains:
    o The Academy submission system-assigned 5-digit submission number.
    o The title of the workshop (in Title Case).
    o The proposed Division sponsor (e.g., ENT Division) and any additional Divisions or Interest Groups that might be appropriate for cross-listing based on shared interests.
    o An abstract of up to 250 words summarizing the workshop.
    Page 2: One (1) page explanation as to why the workshop should be of interest to (a) the ENT division as the primary sponsor and (b) other Divisions or Interest Groups.
    Page 3: One (1) page description of the workshop’s format.
    Pages 4-6: One to three (1-3) page overview of the workshop.
     
    Optional Appendix: You can use space in an Appendix to capture references, Tables (e.g., detailed agenda for the workshop), and/or Figures.    
     
    Proposal Evaluation Rubric
    Proposals will be evaluated based on their ability to attract an audience from within the Entrepreneurship Division and across the Academy of Management, as well as on their level of innovation and potential impact on the professional development and success of participants. While revised versions of previous PDWs are welcome, proposals that simply repeat prior sessions without introducing new or innovative content will not be viewed favorably. Unlike the refereed scholarly program, which follows a double-blind review process and standardized time blocks and formats, PDWs offer greater flexibility in design. They may take a wide variety of formats, must be at least one hour in duration, and are reviewed directly by the PDW Chair.
     
    The PDW Chair will use the following criteria to evaluate proposals:
    a) Expected substantive and networking benefit for participants. Clearly specify the target audience(s) for the PDW and how your proposed session will facilitate their development. 
    b) Plans for creating an interactive and engaging session. Explain how you will structure the session to foster interaction amongst participants and promote inter-disciplinary ‘bridge-building.’
    c) Breadth of interest of the session for individuals and groups within the Division and the broader Academy. Specify the anticipated breadth of interest, noting that you do not need to be ‘all things for all groups.’
    d) Novelty of the topic or the format. Explain how the topic and/or how your proposed PDW format is novel and why introducing that novelty is useful for addressing program goals. 
    e) The effective use of program time. PDWs are typically at least two hours long, though sessions may be as short as 1.5 hours but must a minimum of one-hour duration. Ensure that you explain and justify why the requested time is needed to accomplish your goals and how you plan to maximize the use of that time. In doing so, consider that program time is zero-sum: your requests will ‘trade-off’ program time for other program participants.  
     
    Additional resources and questions to ask
    William Dougan of the University of Wisconsin-Whitewater has developed a helpful resource titled: A Guide for Creating and Managing a Good Professional Development Workshop. You are encouraged to review this guide as you prepare your proposal.
     
    Before submitting a PDW proposal, consider the following questions to assess how well your submission aligns with the PDW evaluation criteria: 
    • Does the workshop offer a high quality and high-impact learning experience that meaningfully contributes to participants’ professional development?
    • Do participants leave the workshop with clear and actionable takeaways (e.g., learning a new skill or developing a new research plan)?
    • Does the workshop present a compelling theme and engage a group of participants likely to attract a strong audience despite competing sessions or scheduling constraints?
    • Does the workshop foster genuine, multi-directional interaction among participants from different Divisions, disciplines, regions, career stages, or demographic backgrounds?
    • Is the workshop creative and innovative in its topical focus, structure, or approach to engagement?
     
    Submission Process and Deadlines
    Proposals should be submitted to the AOM Annual Meeting Submission Center, which is available at the AOM website beginning in early December 2025. Early submissions are encouraged.
     
    The deadline for submissions is Tuesday, January, 13th, 2026, at 5:00 PM ET (New York Time)
     
    The PDW program runs from Friday through Sunday (July 31 – August 2, 2026).
     
    Scholarly sessions (paper sessions and symposia) will be held Sunday, August 2 – Tuesday, August 4, 2026.
     
    Poster sessions will run Friday, July 31 – Tuesday, August 4, 2026. DIGs may opt not to accept posters by notifying AOM.
     
    All named PDW participants must commit to participation in advance. All proposals require a statement indicating that all named participants have consented to participate in the PDW. The AOM’s “Rule of Three” for the PDW program is that “no one may submit or be associated with more than 3 PDW submissions; or appear in more than 3 PDW sessions, regardless of whether the sessions are held on-site or off-site.”
     
    See you in Philadelphia!
Engagement Leaderboard