| CURRENT EDITORIAL COMMITTEE
Editor: Frederick Morgeson,
The Eli Broad College of Business, Michigan State University Associate Editors: Herman Aguinis,
Indiana University Susan J. Ashford,
University of Michigan Committee Members: Jennifer A. Chatman,
University of California, Berkeley David V. Day,
University of Western Australia Ann Marie Ryan,
Michigan State University Benjamin Schneider,
CEB's Workforce Surveys and Analytics Sabine Sonnentag,
University of Mannheim
MULTIMEDIA TAKEAWAYS Watch the following videos in which authors Jason A. Colquitt and Kate P. Zipay, discuss their article "Justice, Fairness, and Employee Reactions," written for the 2015 Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior. What We Learned from Our Justice Review: Takeaways from a Veteran and a Newcomer to the Justice Literature How Exactly Should You Measure Justice? Putting It All Together: Integrating Justice Theories I'm Glad You Asked: Answering Critical Justice Questions
Order your personal subscription here.
Recommend the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior to your librarian for institutional access.
| Volume 2 of the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior is now available online. View the full Table of Contents for Volume 2. The 22 reviews in this volume cover aspects of industrial and organizational psychology, human resource management, and organizational behavior. Topics in this volume include leadership development, corporate social responsibility, the dynamics of well-being, supporting the aging workforce, and stereotype threat in organizations.
We are pleased to provide you and your colleagues complimentary access to the following organizational psychology and organizational behavior review articles for the next 30 days. AUTOBIOGRAPHICAL ARTICLE FROM VOLUME 2: Organizational Psychology Then and Now: Some Observations
Volume 2, 2015
Edgar H. Schein A comparison is made between the field of organizational psychology as I saw it in 1965 and how I see it today. Many issues remain the same, but the field is more differentiated, fragmented, and individualized than ever, despite culture, especially national culture, having become a big topic. The field is much larger and has spawned a whole applied field of organization development and new methods of experiential learning. The biggest change has been the decline of work on group dynamics and group interventions reflecting Western cultures of individualism. TOP TWO MOST DOWNLOADED ARTICLES DURING THE PAST 12 MONTHS: Burnout and Work Engagement: The JD–R Approach
Volume 1, 2014
Arnold B. Bakker, Evangelia Demerouti, and
Ana Isabel Sanz-Vergel Whereas burnout refers to a state of exhaustion and cynicism toward work, engagement is defined as a positive motivational state of vigor, dedication, and absorption. In this article, we discuss the main definitions and conceptualizations of both concepts used in the literature. In addition, we review the most important antecedents of burnout and work engagement by examining situational and individual predictors. We also review the possible consequences of burnout and engagement and integrate the research findings using job demands–resources theory. Personality and Cognitive Ability as Predictors of Effective Performance at Work
Volume 1, 2014
Neal Schmitt Conclusions about the validity of cognitive ability and personality measures based on meta-analyses published mostly in the past decade are reviewed at the beginning of this article. Research on major issues in selection that affect the use and interpretation of validation data are then discussed. |