1. Reviewer of the Year Award winners
2. End of year journal stats
3. Highlights/Final news
1.
It is my utmost pleasure to announce the recipients of the JBP Reviewer of the Year Award. They are:
Eva Derous, Ghent University
Linda Shanock, University of North Carolina Charlotte
Kristen Shockey,Baruch College, City University of New York
Erin Richard, Florida Institute of Technology
Bryan Edwards, Oklahoma State University
Aaron Schmidt, University of Minnesota
Their reviews were comprehensive, presented in a highly constructive and considerate tone, and very much captured the big picture issues
associated with the manuscript being evaluating. Please join me in congratulating them on this achievement. Their service to the journal and more importantly to our profession is truly special.
2.
In 2013 we received near 450 new submissions. This does not include proposals/papers handled outside the system given special features. This is a RECORD year. We also had 134 revisions come in for 2013. Again, this was a record. So, overall, the journal was very busy.
Initial screening decisions (e.g., desk rejects) were made, on average, in 2.6 days. Big thanks to the assistant editors who made this possible in 2013 (Jane Shumski Thomas, Alex Lindsay, Erika Lopina, and Jisoo Ock).
Reviewer accepts review invitation, on average, in just 2 days.
Reviewers, on average, completed their review in 35.9 days.
Vast majority of reviews turned in early, on average, by 12 days.
For 2013 we had 51 accepted articles. Our acceptance rate was approximately 12%.
Of the papers that go under review (so this ignores desk rejects), it looks like 64% are not accepted and 36% get R&Rs by the acting editor. This seems like a good balance to me. This was identical to last year.
The average total time to decision (this adds in associate editor or editor decision making time) for papers not accepted is 67 days and for R&Rs it is 69 days.
Of first R&Rs received, 18% received major revision decisions, 60% received minor revision decisions, and 21% were not accepted. So, R&Rs are meeting with good success. This is a positive increase in R&R conversation.
3.
Some 2013 highlights
The Journal of Business and Psychology has been ranked A in the revised (2013) Australian Business Dean's Council (ABDC) Quality Journal List.