Discussion: View Thread

Human Relations -- this month's free access article, current issue and OnlineFirst articles published ahead of issue

  • 1.  Human Relations -- this month's free access article, current issue and OnlineFirst articles published ahead of issue

    Posted 02-03-2014 13:19

    Apologies for any cross-postings

     

    ___________________________________________________

     

    February free-access article

    ___________________________________________________

     

    Please find details of this month's Human Relations free-access article below – we hope you will enjoy reading it.

     

     

    Queering cross-sex friendships: An analysis of gay and bisexual men's workplace friendships with heterosexual women

    Nick Rumens

    Human Relations 2012; 65 (8): 955–978

    DOI: 10.1177/0018726712442427

    http://hum.sagepub.com/content/65/8/955.full.pdf+html

    This article will be free to access until 28 February 2014.

     

    Abstract

    Organizational research on cross-sex friendships frequently normalizes heterosexuality

    by excluding lesbian, gay and bisexual people. Challenging this heteronormative bias, this

    article mobilizes queer theories to examine how UK gay and bisexual men reproduce

    and contest heterosexist norms in the construction of workplace friendships with

    heterosexual women. For bisexual study participants, interview data reveal how their

    friendship experiences can be rendered epistemologically invisible, especially within

    work environments where bi-negativity is anticipated. In contrast, gay study participants

    appear to adopt discursive strategies in order to create friendships with women that

    are normatively accepted. This article develops a concept of 'queer friendship' as it

    relates to the opportunities that arise within workplace friendships for transcending

    heterosexist norms. It is argued that sustaining the queer aspects of workplace

    relationships can be challenging but worthwhile, with implications for disrupting gender

    binaries and developing open-ended organizational policy definitions of 'acceptable'

    workplace relationships.

     

    Keywords

    bisexuality, cross-sex friendships, gay men, organizational heteronormativity, queer

    friendships, queer theory, workplace friendships, work spou

     

    ___________________________________________________

     

    Current issue of Human Relations

    ___________________________________________________

     

    A new issue of Human Relations is available online: February 2014; Vol. 67, No. 2

    The entire issue can be accessed online at:

    http://hum.sagepub.com/content/67/2.toc

     

    Hybrid accountabilities: When western and non-western accountabilities collide

    Sadhvi Dar

    Human Relations 2014;67 131-151
    http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/67/2/131

     

    Interaction of gender, mentoring, and power distance on career attainment: A cross-cultural comparison

    Aarti Ramaswami, Jia-Chi Huang, and George Dreher

    Human Relations 2014;67 153-173
    http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/67/2/153

     

    Supporting 'superwomen'? Conflicting role prescriptions, gender-equality arrangements and career motivation among Dutch women physicians

    Berber Pas, Pascale Peters, Hans Doorewaard, Rob Eisinga, and Toine Lagro-Janssen

    Human Relations 2014;67 175-204
    http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/67/2/175

     

    NGOs management and the value of 'partnerships' for equality in international development: What's in a name?

    Alessia Contu and Emanuela Girei

    Human Relations 2014;67 205-232
    http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/67/2/205

     

    You can't go home again: And other psychoanalytic lessons from crossing a neo-colonial border

    Ajnesh Prasad

    Human Relations 2014;67 233-257
    http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/67/2/233

     

     

    ___________________________________________________

     

    Recent publication ahead of print articles

    ___________________________________________________

     

    Fun and friends: The impact of workplace fun and constituent attachment on turnover in a hospitality context

    Michael J Tews, John W Michel, and David G Allen

    Human Relations published 16 January 2014, 10.1177/0018726713508143

    http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/0018726713508143v1

     

    Abstract

    Extending the growing body of research on fun in the workplace, this article reports on a study examinining the relationship between fun and employee turnover. Specifically, this research focused on the influence of three forms of fun on turnover – fun activities, coworker socializing and manager support for fun. With a sample of 296 servers from 20 units of a national restaurant chain in the US, coworker socializing and manager support for fun were demonstrated to be significantly related to turnover. In addition, constituent attachment was found to mediate the relationship between each of the three forms of fun and turnover. This research highlights that not all types of fun are equal and demonstrates that one of the key means through which fun influences retention is by facilitating the development of high quality work relationships.

     

     

    'Leader, you first': The everyday production of hierarchical space in a Chinese bureaucracy

    Zhongyuan Zhang and André Spicer

    Human Relations published 16 December 2013, 10.1177/0018726713503021

    http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/0018726713503021v1

     

    Abstract

    Recent studies highlight how organizational power relations are materialized in space. However, relatively little is known about how these spatialized power relations are reproduced on a day-to-day basis. Drawing on a ten-month ethnographic study of a large government office in China, we find that hierarchical space is produced through three intertwined processes. It proliferates as employees actively seek out signs of hierarchy in the organization's space; it becomes familiarized as employees fabricate and circulate fanciful narratives about their spatial environs; and it is ritualized by employees acting out hierarchical relations across the organization's space. These processes resulted in a hardening of the hierarchical relations of power. The study extends the existing literature by showing how hierarchical organizational space is not just something that is imposed on employees; it is also imposed by the employees themselves.

     

     

    Review Article: When 'life itself' goes to work: Reviewing shifts in organizational life through the lens of biopower

    Peter Fleming

    Human Relations published 10 December 2013, 10.1177/0018726713508142

    http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/0018726713508142v1

     

    Abstract

    This review article suggests the English publication of Foucault's lectures on biopower, The Birth of Biopolitics (2008), might be useful for extending our understandings of how organizational power relations have changed over the last 20 years. Unlike disciplinary power, which constrains and delimits individuals, the concept of biopower emphasizes how our life abilities and extra-work qualities (bios or 'life itself') are now key objects of exploitation – particularly under neoliberalism. The term biocracy is introduced to analyse recent reports on workplace experiences symptomatic of biopower. Finally, the conceptual weaknesses of biopower for organizational theorizing are critically evaluated to help develop the idea for future scholarship.

     

     

    Stigma, identity and power: Managing stigmatized identities through discourse

    Sammy Toyoki and Andrew D Brown

    Human Relations published 10 December 2013, 10.1177/0018726713503024

    http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/0018726713503024v1

     

    Abstract

    We analyse how men incarcerated in Helsinki Prison managed, through talk, their stigmatized identities as prisoners. Three strategies are identified: 'appropriation' of the label 'prisoner'; claiming coveted social identities; and representing oneself as a 'good' person. The research contribution we make is to show how inmates dealt with their self-defined stigmatized identities through discourse, and how these strategies were effects of power. We argue that stigmatized identities are best theorized in relation to individuals' repertoires of other (non-stigmatized) identities that they may draw on to make supportive self-claims. Prisoners, like other kinds of organizational participants, we argue, often have considerable scope for managing diverse, fragile, perhaps even contradictory, understandings of their selves.

     

     

    'I had the luxury . . .': Organizational breastfeeding support as privatized privilege

    Paaige K Turner and Kristen Norwood

    Human Relations published 10 December 2013, 10.1177/0018726713507730

    http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/0018726713507730v1

     

    Abstract

    To make the combination of breastfeeding and work feasible, women who return to work full time in the USA need some measure of organizational breastfeeding support. Yet, many organizations do not have lactation policies in place, co-worker and supervisor communication can be discouraging, and predominant cultural Discourses in the US position breastfeeding at odds with organizational values, often requiring women to define and negotiate support themselves. Drawing upon Structuration Theory, we analyzed interviews conducted with US women who breastfed and worked to illuminate the meanings they held for breastfeeding and organizational breastfeeding support and how those meanings challenge and reproduce social systems that make breastfeeding and working a potentially difficult combination. We argue that their construction of breastfeeding support as a privatized privilege re/produces cultural Discourses that marginalize women's bodies in organizations. In order to engender support for all bodies that challenge the borders between public/private, feminine/masculine and personal/professional, meanings must be changed at both macro and micro levels of communication.

     

     

    Resolving couples' work–family conflicts: The complexity of decision making and the introduction of a new framework

    Laura S Radcliffe and Catherine Cassell

    Human Relations published 10 December 2013, 10.1177/0018726713506022

    http://hum.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/0018726713506022v1

     

    Abstract

    The goal of this study is to develop a theoretical framework in order to illuminate the cues involved in real life work–family conflict resolution within dual-earner couples. We draw on episodic and longitudinal data from qualitative diaries kept for a one-month period by both members of 24 dual-earner couples (48 participants) with child dependants, as well as from introductory and subsequent in-depth qualitative interviews with the couples, both together and apart. Two distinct types of work–family decision making: a) anchoring decisions and b) daily decisions were revealed, each of which were differentially impacted by enabling and constraining cues, considerations of fairness and equity, and beliefs, values and preferences. The findings suggest that the decision-making process engaged in by couples in incidents of work–family conflict does not progress in a logical sequence, but instead involves numerous complex negotiations and interactions. A decision-making framework encapsulating these findings is reported, highlighting the cues considered when making both types of work–family conflict decisions, and the relationships between them.

     

    ___________________________________________________

     

    Special issue call for papers

    ___________________________________________________

     

    30th Anniversary – Beyond Morgan's eight metaphors

    http://www.tavinstitute.org/humanrelations/special_issues/Morgan.html

     

    Guest Editors:

    Anders Örtenblad (Nottingham University Business School, China)

    Linda Putnam (University of California Santa Barbara, USA) and

    Kiran Trehan (University of Birmingham, UK)

    Invited commenter: Gareth Morgan, York University, Canada

     

    Submission deadline: 31 May 2014. Papers should not be submitted before 01 May 2014.

     

    --

    Best wishes,

     

    Claire Castle

    Managing Editor, Human Relations 

    Telephone: +44 (0)7432740583

    Email: c.castle@tavinstitute.org

     

    Website: www.humanrelationsjournal.org

    OnlineFirst forthcoming articles: http://hum.sagepub.com/content/early/recent

    Submission guidance: http://www.tavinstitute.org/humanrelations/submit_paper.html

     

    Human Relations 2012 Impact Factor:
    2-year impact factor: 1.938

    5-year impact factor: 2.901

    Source: 2012 Journal Citation Reports® (Thomson Reuters, 2013)

     

     




    Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to


    The contents of this e-mail are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed.

    Any opinions expressed in this e-mail are those of the individual and not necessarily those of the company.

    The Tavistock Institute accepts no responsibility for information, error or omissions in this e-mail, nor for its

    use or misuse, nor for any act committed or omitted in connection with this communication. If you have received

    this e-mail in error or if you are concerned about its contents please destroy it and contact the sender via e-mail return.

    ______________________________________________________________________
                      This email has been scanned by BlackSpider Mailcontrol.
    ______________________________________________________________________