Early- to Mid-Career Scholarly Achievement Award

Organizational Behavior Division, a division of the Academy of Management

Career Awards

The Early- to Mid-Career Scholarly Achievement Award recognizes an OB scholar whose work in the early-to-mid stage of their career already reflects the highest standards our community of 6,000+ members across 60+ countries holds central: rigor, relevance, and relationships.

Meet the 2026 recipient and explore every past honoree below.

Early- to Mid-Career Scholarly Achievement Award

Sponsored by the Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Recognizes the scholarly accomplishments of an OB scholar in the early-to-mid career stage, judged against the same principles of rigor, relevance, and relationships.

2026 recipient

Michael D. Baer, 2026 Early- to Mid-Career Scholarly Achievement Award recipient

Michael D. Baer

Dean's Council Distinguished Professor, Arizona State University W. P. Carey School of Business

Michael D. Baer receives the Early- to Mid-Career Scholarly Achievement Award for a rapidly growing body of scholarship and service that, as his nominators emphasize, "Mike represents the kind of star scholar I hope we want to spotlight: someone who lifts others, advances OB with unwavering standards, and leads with principle and generous citizenship. He has exemplified the OB Division's mission in distinctive, enduring ways that deeply align with what our field aspires to be." His record reflects the highest standards of scientific quality: careful theory, methodological soundness, and a commitment to building knowledge that is robust and cumulative. Rather than chasing novelty, his work clarifies and advances understanding of core OB phenomena in ways other scholars can confidently build on.

Since completing his PhD in 2015, Professor Baer has published a remarkable stream of research, including 23 articles in consensus top-tier OB outlets, that has fundamentally "changed the conversation" in the trust and justice literatures. His research pushes the field toward a more psychologically and organizationally realistic model of trust dynamics, challenging the assumption that feeling trusted is uniformly positive. Instead, he has shown it can be a double-edged sword, simultaneously increasing pride and performance while also creating pressure, workload, and reputation concerns that can elevate burnout. He extended this by demonstrating the misalignment costs of trust desired versus trust received. In the fairness domain, his work has counterintuitively revealed that "talking it out" about supervisor unfairness can actually damage relationships and impede emotional recovery.

Just as important, his rigor extends to the way he approaches the scientific enterprise itself. As Editor-in-Chief of Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, he has strengthened the review process, recruiting a diverse and high-caliber team of associate editors, shepherding the journal's adoption of Level 2 Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) guidelines, and increasing submissions by roughly 50%. Beyond his editorial leadership, he is a consummate citizen of the OB Division who "builds the people and social infrastructure that enable our science." He repeatedly volunteers for divisional service, mentoring doctoral students who coauthor a striking share of his top-tier work and guiding them toward top-tier placements. As one nominator observed, "he is the person who shows up, especially when the work is invisible, time-consuming, and designed to serve others instead of his own record."

Award winners by year ▾
About this award ▾

The Division recognizes the scholarly accomplishments of individuals in their early-to-mid career stages. Nominees are evaluated on the same three principles as the Lifetime Achievement Award — rigor (scientific quality and methodological soundness), relevance (the influence and significance of their contributions to the science of OB), and relationships (collaboration, leadership, service, and mentorship) — calibrated to this career stage, and are held to the same standard of ethical conduct.